What are unfair labor practices?
Unfair labor practices (ULPs) are any actions by an organization, its representatives, or labor unions that violate employees’ statutory rights or disrupt healthy relationships between the parties in an employment relationship. In practice, this may include restricting employees’ right to organize or engage in collective bargaining, unequal treatment in hiring or employment, threats against whistleblowers, or entering into agreements that bypass applicable labor laws.
For HR professionals and managers, the concept of unfair labor practices serves as a warning against behaviors that can erode team trust, trigger legal disputes, or damage the company’s reputation.
The concept of unfair labor practices originates from U.S. labor law, with its foundation in the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935, also known as the Wagner Act. This landmark legislation was the first to define actions considered unfair and to establish a framework for protecting employees’ collective rights in the United States.
Oversight and enforcement fall primarily to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) – an independent federal agency that investigates complaints, conducts hearings, and issues rulings on alleged violations. In specific industries or for certain groups of workers, other bodies may also have jurisdiction, such as the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) for the federal public sector.
An employee who suspects their rights have been violated can file a charge directly with the NLRB or seek assistance from their labor union if they are a member. Depending on the situation, consulting an employment attorney or reaching out to worker advocacy nonprofits may also be helpful.
While specific regulations on unfair labor practices vary between countries, the underlying principle remains the same – protecting workers from abuse and fostering fair workplace relationships. Since 1919, the International Labour Organization (ILO) has developed conventions and recommendations that set global standards, including freedom of association and collective bargaining rights. Countries that ratify these documents commit to aligning their laws with the recommended norms.
In Europe, protections against unfair labor practices are also embedded in European Union law, such as the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and directives on equal treatment, working conditions, and employee information rights. Enforcement typically falls to national labor inspectorates, labor courts, or specialized bodies that handle collective disputes.
Outside the United States, employees can seek help from local unions, worker organizations, labor inspectorates, or non-governmental organizations. In some legal systems, mediation or arbitration is also available as a less formal way to resolve disputes.
Because the term “unfair labor practices” originates from U.S. labor law, similar actions in other countries may be regulated under different provisions or described using other terms. The following examples are therefore intended as a general reference and highlight employer behaviors that violate employee rights or bypass fair employment standards:
Unfair labor practices are not limited to employers – unions can also overstep their authority or fail the very workers they are meant to support. Because labor laws and terminology differ across countries, the following examples should be viewed as a general overview rather than binding legal definitions:
Unfair labor practices affect multiple aspects of a company’s operations and can undermine its overall performance and growth:
Violations of labor law can trigger proceedings before labor courts that may last months or even years, tying up significant organizational resources. Audits or arbitration processes require careful documentation and cooperation with inspectors. Companies may also be ordered to reinstate dismissed employees and compensate them for wages lost during unlawful termination. In addition, organizations often need to revise workplace policies, internal procedures, and employment conditions to comply with legal requirements – a process that consumes HR and legal resources.
The financial consequences include administrative fines and compensation payments to employees, which often exceed several months’ wages and must be paid with statutory interest charges. Organizations also face the cost of legal representation, external compliance audits, and the implementation of corrective measures. In more serious cases, mediation or out-of-court settlements can add further expenses but may resolve disputes more quickly.
News about unfair labor practices can spread quickly through industry platforms, social media, and employer review sites. This can deter potential candidates, erode current employees’ engagement, and even affect partnerships – especially as more businesses consider ESG standards when selecting collaborators. A tarnished reputation can make it harder to attract top talent in competitive fields.
Unfair labor practices can increase employee turnover, driving up recruitment and onboarding costs. Lower team morale often results in decreased productivity and higher rates of sick leave. In extreme cases, protests or strikes can disrupt business continuity. A climate of distrust within the company can also lead to more frequent internal conflicts and challenges in executing cross-functional projects.
HR shapes standards and procedures within the framework set by senior leadership and board decisions. While it cannot stop deliberate legal violations, it can reduce mistakes caused by lack of knowledge or disorganized processes. To lower the likelihood of unfair labor practices and strengthen a culture of transparency, HR can:
The way a company treats its people directly shapes its reputation, team loyalty, and ability to execute business plans. Unfair labor practices are not just violations of the law – they expose weaknesses in organizational culture and management processes.
The risk of such practices drops when HR professionals and managers align their decisions with company values, stay attentive to team dynamics, and respond quickly to potential issues. This approach not only shields the company from legal exposure but also signals to employees that their employer values respectful and responsible relationships.