Talent calibration with the grid already built from your reviews

It is an n-box grid, and the familiar three-by-three is one of its shapes. Two three-point questions divide each axis into three; two five-point questions divide each into five. Only the intersections that have people are marked, so you see where your team sits. In the product the screen is called Insights and sits inside a review cycle.

No. Your team decides what the session compares, who attends, what each position on the grid means and how a placement is agreed. PeopleForce builds the grid: it collects manager answers through the review cycle, places everyone whose manager answered both questions, filters the grid and exports the full list.

On the Insights tab of a manual review cycle whose Manager reviewer uses a question template with at least one rating or competency question. Lifecycle reviews are a single page and have no Insights tab. The tab appears as soon as the cycle’s reviews are built; until managers answer, the grid has no data to show.

Manager answers from the cycle, in their latest version. Other reviewers’ answers aren’t plotted, and an employee whose manager answered only one of the two selected questions doesn’t appear on the grid.

No. The axes are drawn from rating questions and competency questions. Objective answers are not available for selection.

The person who created the cycle, anyone with the permission to manage review cycles, and collaborators added to that cycle. Managers and employees do not see it by default.